Workflow before screens
Map who starts an operation, who reviews it and which documents and decisions it produces. Define exceptions, cancellations and changes before translating them into screens and execution rules.
COREXIA / CUSTOM SOFTWARE
When an off-the-shelf product does not cover the required workflow, we review the problem and build around its actual steps. The solution might be a team portal, request and approval system, operational dashboard or integration between tools you already use.
Discuss your requirementsMap who starts an operation, who reviews it and which documents and decisions it produces. Define exceptions, cancellations and changes before translating them into screens and execution rules.
Identify roles, data scope and allowed actions. Plan users, branches, documents and the required audit trail around the nature and sensitivity of the workflow.
Review existing tools, interfaces and record ownership. Specify synchronization, duplicates and errors, including steps that should remain manual or require review.
Define which questions each report answers and where every figure comes from. Implementation can be split into stages with clear scope and acceptance criteria, then evolve with the business.
Review workflows, roles and information, then write outcomes that can be tested.
Validate screens, rules and integrations with the relevant users before expanding.
Test normal cases, exceptions and permissions, then define migration, training and operation.
We review its structure, access rights and modification or integration options before deciding whether to extend it or build a connected service.
We define sources, quality, mappings and validation rules, then test a sample and review plan before agreeing the full migration.
By the scope, users, integrations, delivery stages and acceptance criteria. Business rules and exceptions can affect implementation more than the screen count alone.